Hi Esther and Ryan,

I just wanted to chime in here with some of my own experiences regarding LaTeX  
- hope that's okay. When I first began using Mac OS X, there was no accessible 
way for me to insert footnotes and other information into my assignments.  
After doing some research on the net I discovered LaTeX. Not only was this 
fantastic typesetting system cross-platform, but it offered exactly what I 
needed - with the added bonus that despite being totally blind, I could be 
confident that my assignments would be exactly what I instructed LaTeX they 
should be. This didn't mean that I didn't get a trusted friend to take a look 
and tell me if things were wonky, but 99 per cent of the time this was not 
necessary. After having used LaTeX for over two years (and I am still 
learning), I always use LaTeX for long documents and official printed material 
such as my Resumé and letters. 

As Esther has pointed out, the initial learning curve is a steep one and for 
most people is overkill, but the other advantage of LaTeX (and there are 
others) for me is that because LaTeX handles the formatting of the document - 
and by the document, I mean you can pretty much customize it any which way you 
want to. This allows me to concentrate on the content of my documents, 
especially at University. Before I  found out about LaTeX, I was spending so 
much time  ensuring that the documents looked exactly as my Professors wanted 
them to that the content quality was suffering. Finally, once I got a handle on 
LaTeX, I was able to create my own LaTeX commands which greatly increased my 
productivity. In fact, as I am typing this reply, I have just thought of some 
footnote commands I should have created, which would have saved me hours of 
re-checking  and ensuring that books and journal articles were identified 
correctly, as each was cited in a different way. 

Anyway... that's enough of my experiences.

HTH
TC
James  
On 4 Dec 2009, at 18:33, Esther wrote:

> Hi Ryan,
> 
> Ryan Mann wrote:
> 
>> I don't understand.  Why can't you just type something like 4x=20  
>> into a word document?  That is, unless this isn't what you mean by  
>> an equation.
>> 
> 
> The answer is that most professional mathematicians, physicists, or  
> (in some disciplines) engineers have to use equations that have  
> special symbols for integral signs, limits, series expansions, Greek  
> letters, etc. and that these can be embedded several levels deep in  
> both numerator and denominator.   These expressions are a nightmare to  
> enter properly into a word document with correct placement.
> 
> The original TeX programming language was developed by the computer  
> scientist, Donald Knuth, as a way of getting around the extremely high  
> price of publishing mathematical textbooks due to its special type- 
> setting needs and also to get around the often poor final production  
> results.  In developing TeX Knuth studied typeface design and devised  
> algorithms for optimal placement, spacing, and justification of text  
> for any given font type.
> 
> In most word-processing packages (including Word documents), not only  
> is it nearly impossible to correctly generate some complex equations,  
> but once you have managed to do so the results are even harder to  
> correctly insert within the document.  Usually, sighted users have to  
> try, look at the incorrect results, and then figure out some way to  
> fudge up the correct placement and spacing.  TeX will correctly  
> compute, place, and even break up multi-line equations automatically.   
> It will also, incidentally, handle optimal spacing, alignment, etc.  
> for all regular (i.e., not technical) documents, so you can publish  
> entire books originally produced in TeX. In the physical sciences,  
> many professional journals use TeX as the default submission format,  
> since it is freely available and works cross-platform.
> 
> At what was originally the Los Alamos preprint site (and what has now  
> become ArXiv, with several sites across the world) for the electronic  
> distribution of scientific work by physicists, mathematicians,  
> computer scientists, and others, well over 99 per cent of the  
> submissions are in TeX format -- even for papers without equations.   
> The fact  that TeX does an excellent job in outputting all  
> international languages including those that do not use alphabetic  
> characters also adds to its popularity.
> 
> The main drawback is that it has a steep initial learning curve, and  
> is probably overkill for what most people need to do in word  
> processing.  However, it is extremely convenient to be able to change  
> the entire layout of your paper simply by changing a one-word argument  
> for the style file you are using. (And by change, I mean formatting  
> far beyond what Word supports --- not just line spacing and fonts, but  
> how sections and sub-sections are numbered and formatted, their  
> indentations conventions, etc.  Or in bibliography mode, whether the  
> entries are listed in the order they are cited or alphabetically, and  
> with which citation style.)
> 
> HTH.  Dónal or Nicolai might want to add comments.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Esther
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 4, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Donal Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> 
>>> No bother Nick.  Have to say that I wholeheartedly approve of that  
>>> requirement...  If you've never tried to insert equations into a  
>>> word doc, be very grateful.  That kind of experience should be  
>>> reserved for the truly masochistic. *smile*
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> Donal
>>> On 4 Dec 2009, at 12:11, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Donal,
>>>> 
>>>> I definitely will. Thanks a lot for the tips, and great someone  
>>>> knows about this. It's a requirement in my country for  
>>>> mathematical studies. I'll definitely throw some questions your way.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Nic
>>>> Skype: Kvalme
>>>> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
>>>> AIM: cincinster
>>>> yahoo Messenger: cin368
>>>> Facebook Profile
>>>> My Twitter
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 4, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>   Yep I find TeXshop fine.  I use it to prepare academic papers  
>>>>> and lectures.  Another useful utility by the way is the BibDesc  
>>>>> one.  It's a very very useful tool for organising bibliographies.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As you're learning LaTeX, feel free to contact me off list if any  
>>>>> questions arise.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> 
>>>>> Donal
>>>>> On 4 Dec 2009, at 12:02, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hmm. Yeah, I heard of TeXShop. I've always spelt it LaTEX, with  
>>>>>> L capitalized, including TEX but not the a. It didn't seem to  
>>>>>> matter much how I w typed it, though. But thanks for the  
>>>>>> recommendation. I assume TeXShop is accessible, then.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Nic
>>>>>> Skype: Kvalme
>>>>>> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
>>>>>> AIM: cincinster
>>>>>> yahoo Messenger: cin368
>>>>>> Facebook Profile
>>>>>> My Twitter
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Donal Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Nick,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I use TeXShop.  By the way, know what you mean about the  
>>>>>>> dangers of googling this...  To improve your hits, spell it "L  
>>>>>>> Aa T e X"  (that is, the L, T and X capitalised).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Donal
>>>>>>> On 4 Dec 2009, at 11:54, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm currently learning LaTEX, and I've been looking for a  
>>>>>>>> Macintosh interpreter. Can anyone help with this? Google  
>>>>>>>> interestingly leads me to Latex rubber and fetish sites. It's  
>>>>>>>> kind of creepy. I figured I'd just stop Googling.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Nic
>>>>>>>> Skype: Kvalme
>>>>>>>> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
>>>>>>>> AIM: cincinster
>>>>>>>> yahoo Messenger: cin368
>>>>>>>> Facebook Profile
>>>>>>>> My Twitter
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
>>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
>>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
>>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
>>>>> Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> .
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>>>>> .
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to  
>>>> macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>>>> .
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>>> .
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en 
>> .
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.


Reply via email to