mine is starting to squeel does that mean mine is dieing? ----- Original Message ----- From: "erik burggraaf" <e...@erik-burggraaf.com> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:02 PM Subject: Re: Abbyy FineReader works well
> > SOME DO, BUT YOU HAVE TO BE SOOOO CAREFUL. SOME OF THOSE HAVE REALLY > RANCID COMPONANTS IN THEM. BAD MOTORS ON THE SCANNER HEAD, AND SO > ON. I TRY TO AVOID ALL IN ONES PERSONALLY, THOUGH I HAVE SEEN ONE OR > TWO THAT I DIDN'T MIND. > > IT'S ALSO WORTH NOTING THAT MANY OF THE LEXMARK ALL IN ONES HAVE AN > ACCESSIBLE WEB INTERFACE FOR ADJUSTING SETTINGS AND PERFORMING JOBS > DIRECTLY ON THE ALL IN ONE. I'M JUST NOT SURE THEY ARE MAC > COMPADIBLE, THOUGH I DON'T SEE WHY THEY WOULDN'T BE. > > BEST, > > erik burggraaf > A+ certified technician and user support consultant. > Phone: 888-255-5194 > Email: e...@erik-burggraaf.com > > On 2009-11-10, at 4:51 PM, hank smith wrote: > >> >> I heard the hp line of all in ones work well >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jessi and Goldina" <sanginsista3...@gmail.com> >> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:23 PM >> Subject: Re: Abbyy FineReader works well >> >> >> >> hey Anne, >> is there a list somewhere of scanners that work directly with >> finereader? or >> does anyone have suggestions for ones that do? I'm probably on the >> market >> for a new one anyway. would be really great if I could get one of >> those >> scanner/coppier/printer combos since my printer, as great as it is, >> isn't >> mac compatible. do those work with finereader? I guess it would >> depend on >> the brand. >> On 2009-11-10, at 11:44 AM, Anne Robertson wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello Dan, >>> >>> The problem with Abbyy FineReader is that it doesn't work with >>> network >>> scanners. However, you can give it a file of images to OCR if your >>> scanner >>> doesn't work directly with FineReader. >>> >>> I compared a document recognised by Readiris, and the same document >>> recognise with Finereader and Finereader did a slightly beter job >>> in that >>> there were slightly fewer errors. Both did a good job but >>> Finereader did a >>> better job. >>> >>> FineReader is cheaper than Readiris and the installation and >>> registration >>> process are both completely accessible with VoiceOver. >>> >>> Readiris 12 can be installed using VoiceOver, but you get no feed >>> back at >>> times, which is why I posted directions on how to register Readiris >>> 12 on >>> this list. >>> >>> I use VueScan to drive both of my scanners since they're both made by >>> Cannon and the drivers are not accessible with VO. VueScan uses the >>> Scangear driver in one case, making it accessible, and has its own >>> driver >>> for the scanner in the other case. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Anne >>> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
