Oh goodness. I'm so sorry. I didn't mean to cause confusion. No. I
thought I had read someplace on this list that soneone had thought num
pad commander was getting scrapped.
It isn't. Thank goodness because that's what I use now that I have a
wireless keyboard connected to the macbook...

This leads me to a question though. If SL is going to support
bluetooth braille displays, would they or is there even, a bluetooth
keyboard to buy? I'm thinking something along the lines of a small
desktop sort of bluetooth keyboard.  I like the wireless one but it
takes up one of my two USB ports and my t-drive takes up the other
when I'm in the bedroom... I need more usb ports and if I could
scruntch my USB requirements I wouldn't have to look for such a large
usb hub.
Best wishes
Jenny

On 7/9/09, James & Nash <james.austin1...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Ah ok i understand now tahnk you
>
> James
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Jurgensen" <asquare...@gmail.com>
> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Voice Over in Snow Leopard
>
>
>>
>> HI,
>>
>> No. The older Macbooks used to have a built-in Numpad overlay. The
>> external numpads and esktop keyboard number pads still work in Leopard.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex,
>>
>>
>> On 9-Jul-09, at 7:06 AM, James & Nash wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Alex, are you saying that if I were to buy an ordinary  MacBook
>>> and i
>>> attached a desktop keyboard to it, I would be unable to use the numpad
>>> commander. Is this also the case for MacBook Pro?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> James
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Alex Jurgensen" <asquare...@gmail.com>
>>> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:20 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Voice Over in Snow Leopard
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> HI,
>>>>
>>>> They scrapped the number pad on the Macbooks,, but as far as
>>>> anythingelse, I have not heard anyting.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alex,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9-Jul-09, at 2:39 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jenny, what gave you the idea they would scrap the Numpad Commander.
>>>>> There is nothing that indicates there was any such plan. Did you
>>>>> read
>>>>> this somewhere or did someone tell you this?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Jenny Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay hi. If I remember correctly the num pad commander was going to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> in SL. I thought I read in this thred that it was getting scrapped.
>>>>>> But I don't think it is.
>>>>>> I know we have to wait 'til September. But that doesn't make it
>>>>>> easy.
>>>>>> I think we shoould have demos of the accessibility features just
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> the sighted people get a peak at stuff. But good points have been
>>>>>> made
>>>>>> that WWDC is for developers. Although the keynote and demos there
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> are made public. So I think it would be nice to have access demos.
>>>>>> But
>>>>>> understand they may not have enough people to do this or unaware
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> interest is out there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The windows access providers offer demos because that is their main
>>>>>> thing. To move windows access. So of corse they will have demos.
>>>>>> Apple
>>>>>> has all sorts of stuff going on. I'm not mad about it or feel put
>>>>>> in a
>>>>>> lower class of users or anything. I think it is so awesome Apple
>>>>>> has
>>>>>> not only built in access but done such a steller job with what they
>>>>>> have. It seems that they listen to us when we have trouble as do
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> developers of many software offerings for the mac. So I'm going to
>>>>>> cut
>>>>>> them a little slack.
>>>>>> Best wishes.
>>>>>> Jenny
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/8/09, Marshall Scott <sc...@cvrti.utah.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another thing to remember is that WWDC is not intended for the
>>>>>>> general
>>>>>>> public.  You have to pay to get into the meeting and it's
>>>>>>> primarily
>>>>>>> intended for developers.  Also, I believe that most of the rest of
>>>>>>> WWDC is under NDA.  I've heard you can actually buy videos of the
>>>>>>> other sessions but I don't think they're inexpensive.
>>>>>>> Marsh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Scott Howell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't believe there is any problem putting your finger on it. I
>>>>>>>> won't disagree that perhaps some demonstration of some features
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> not hurt and I encourage you to contact accessibil...@apple.com
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> make the suggestion. It is possible they simply have not
>>>>>>>> considered
>>>>>>>> this or it is also possible that do to ongoing efforts to improve
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> insure the enhancements are functioning properly, it may not be
>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>> to offer a demonstration. Also, it could even be there is simply
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> enough staff to even put a demo together. I don't know exactly
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> number of folks dedicated to the accessibility of the os and
>>>>>>>> apps,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> it may be an issue of resources. I don't disagree it would be
>>>>>>>> nice
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> see accessibility get a bit more face-time like the other
>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the os. Where I have an issue is with statements that indicate an
>>>>>>>> entitlement and therefore that is why I made the comments I
>>>>>>>> did. I
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> understand and appreciate the desire to have a preview, we all
>>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>>> know what's coming, but there may very well be reasons for why it
>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>> not happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Justin Harford wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just got a look at this thread.  It seems that, once again,
>>>>>>>>> I am
>>>>>>>>> ignorant of how we, as equal citizens with equal legal
>>>>>>>>> responsibilities should view ourselves as apple customers.  I
>>>>>>>>> wonder
>>>>>>>>> if someone might please educate me on what is wrong with the
>>>>>>>>> proposition that we should have some sort of audio
>>>>>>>>> demonstrations
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> upcoming apple accessibility developments.  Please allow me to
>>>>>>>>> explain
>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course the idea that we are entitled to this information as
>>>>>>>>> blind people is completely ridiculous, but I still wonder why no
>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>> is bothered that apple don't put out a demo of the technology
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>> to listen to.  Scott you said
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "You are not entitled to know any more than your sighted
>>>>>>>>> counterpart."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I agree.  As it is, our sighted counterparts get to see live
>>>>>>>>> demonstrations of the technologies in which they will invest
>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> money.  There was a snow-leopard demo at the last WWDC.  When
>>>>>>>>> Leopard
>>>>>>>>> came out, there was also a WWDC demo and more demos on apple's
>>>>>>>>> website.  When the iPhone 3gs came out, apple offered a
>>>>>>>>> demonstration
>>>>>>>>> on their website.  When the iPod shuffle came out, apple again
>>>>>>>>> offered
>>>>>>>>> a demo on their website.  In all of these cases, perhaps with
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> exception of the shuffle and maybe the voice control on the
>>>>>>>>> iPhone if
>>>>>>>>> you count that as accessibility, there was no demonstration of
>>>>>>>>> VoiceOver.  Of course, the blind as such a small customer base
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>> give apple no occasion to suffer itself to demonstrate VO before
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>> audience of WWDC developers and customers, who couldn't care
>>>>>>>>> less,
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> is putting up a little audio demonstration on their
>>>>>>>>> accessibility
>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>> really too much to ask?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is true.  I'm not entitled to know anything more than my
>>>>>>>>> sighted
>>>>>>>>> counterpart, and I guess at this point, that is how things are.
>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>> sighted don't know how accessibility works under snow-leopard,
>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> I don't know.  I know that snow-leopard offers the capability to
>>>>>>>>> watch
>>>>>>>>> movies through finder icons, just as the sighted know.  The
>>>>>>>>> average
>>>>>>>>> sighted joe does not care about accessibility improvements, just
>>>>>>>>> as I
>>>>>>>>> don't care about watching movies through icons.  Something just
>>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>> wrong here, though I'm having trouble putting my finger on it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think that apple customers should be shown the things they
>>>>>>>>> care
>>>>>>>>> about.  Some people care about photos on the mac, so they show
>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>> Some people care about listening to music and watching videos,
>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>> show it.  Some people want to be productive in a business
>>>>>>>>> setting
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> their macs, so they show productivity.  Some people care about
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> development tools, so they show those.  In our case, we care
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> accessibility, why not show it, not because we are blind people
>>>>>>>>> looking for concessions or special treatment, but as consumers
>>>>>>>>> spending money on apple products.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have read the descriptions of snow leopard, and am pretty sure
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> I will buy a copy when it comes out, because the descriptions on
>>>>>>>>> apple's website are compelling enough.  Even if accessibility
>>>>>>>>> improvements prove to be minor or non-existent, the improvements
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> speed and stability will make it worth the money.  So, I don't
>>>>>>>>> feel
>>>>>>>>> the need to raise a scandal over the fact that I can't legally
>>>>>>>>> listen
>>>>>>>>> to an audio demonstration of VoiceOver 3.0.  No problem.
>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, the fact that people wanting a little taste of
>>>>>>>>> future
>>>>>>>>> apple accessibility developments, like the demonstrations that
>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> sighted counterparts get, are so brusquely talked down and at
>>>>>>>>> times
>>>>>>>>> hunted like criminals and reported to the authorities, continues
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> elude me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is the view I have of things now.  As I stated before, it
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> becoming increasingly obvious that it is out-of-step with the
>>>>>>>>> common
>>>>>>>>> consensus, so I wonder if someone might not come forward and
>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>> why I am wrong.  The perspectives and premises we hold in life
>>>>>>>>> profoundly govern the way we carry ourselves in the world.  I
>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>> certainly would not want to continue harboring views which cause
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> conduct to  be excessively abrasive and unpalatable to those
>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>> me.  That is why, without sarcasm, I'm asking for a change in
>>>>>>>>> perspective for me and the others who ignorantly continue in
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>> Justin Harford
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Scott Howell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, no, you as a blind person do not have a right to know
>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>> different than anyone else. You are not entitled to know any
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> your sighted counterpart. WHen Apple releases the information
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> Snow Leopard, you can read and make a decision as to whether or
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> you would want to upgrade, just as anyone else would. Being
>>>>>>>>>> blind
>>>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>> not extend any special entitlements and any violation of the
>>>>>>>>>> NDA
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> was signed is not only breaking a contract between you and
>>>>>>>>>> Apple
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> whomever you entered into the agreement with, it also
>>>>>>>>>> jeopardizes
>>>>>>>>>> future involvement in other projects. Point is you agreed to a
>>>>>>>>>> contract and knowing the terms and conditions of that contract,
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> are legally bound and obligated to comply with the agreement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> fair enough though we are all blind and have a right to know
>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> be included in my view
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2009, at 19:11, Alex Jurgensen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Red flag,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We are moving into grey ares. Please keep the posts NDA
>>>>>>>>>>>> compliant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7-Jul-09, at 10:46 AM, Justin Harford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 10:13 AM, william lomas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what I meant to say was I am not sure if voice over itself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ship
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with voices in italian, greek, arabic, russian polish, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we are still locked down to using acapella
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2009, at 18:07, Koumanova Rostislava wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i did not understand this post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i know that you have to buy the foreign languages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Il giorno 07/lug/09, alle ore 18:06, william lomas ha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it says on the site the quickstart is localised in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eighteen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> languages
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with nine new ones and with the voices you can hear it in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> languages
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but i hope that the eighteen or so work with pre-defined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foreign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voices
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2009, at 16:51, Simon Cavendish wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> O yes, I entirely agree. They have always acknowledged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure they are trying to do their best in Braille
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't be without my Mac now. No regrets switching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With best wishes, Simon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2009, at 16:44, James & Nash wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hear what you're saying Simon. To Apple's credit,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledged my messages and have offered support where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like and would continue to use Windows for things but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> miss
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why I'm going to purchase a new one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Simon Cavendish"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <simon.cavend...@googlemail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:34 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Voice Over in Snow Leopard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been e-mailing Apple accessibility regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> broader support in refreshable Braille for other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> languages. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snow Leopard is going to bring this aspect to those of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit from it. It would certainly accelerate my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behind altogether.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2009, at 11:50, James & Nash wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well on the Snow Leopard page there is a host of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think I remember reading that something - it may have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Voice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Over - was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> localized in about 40 different languages. But I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Braille
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support. However, if you can some way implement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRLTTY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may get native foreign language Braille support. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based, so this should not be too difficult.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "william lomas" <lomaswill...@googlemail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 11:39 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Voice Over in Snow Leopard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a complete list of new features? i.e.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .do we get new language voices i wonder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . new braille support in other alnguages?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i guess we will not know these details really until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> product
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2009, at 11:29, James & Nash wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds like Snow Leopard is an upgrade. Is this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fortunately, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a copy of 10.5 which I bought last year so if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be any problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Scott Howell" <s.how...@verizon.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:25 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Voice Over in Snow Leopard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe so, but it will be worth upgrading and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unreal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't make much since to skip this upgrade. There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasons
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beyond accessibility to upgrade. I can guarantee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very small price to pay for the improvements and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not have considered or realized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 2:47 AM, william lomas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i doubt we get new voices except maybe the ones
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am going to wait to upgrade i think, what I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UPgrading won't give us for example, access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flash
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in me upgrading since a lot of sites I use,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flash
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> navigation which adobe have not yet incorporated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> safari or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other web browsers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2009, at 02:53, Jenny Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yay! I'm very very glad to hear this wonderful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news. A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bummed I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have a fancy trackpad. I have heard some of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gestures just sound so cool and fun.   I guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old tech. LOL I hope to get an iPhone in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to wait 'til then to try gestures. Unless my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macbook
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens first. But as this one is still fairly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know by the time it comes time for me to get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macbook
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they'll of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> come up with many more new and cool things. :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smiley :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can't wait 'til SL comes out. I know it's not too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sounds so awesome. Am keen to hear any new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voices.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the UK voices. The best thing would be a UK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breths and all. I still think that's uber cool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenny
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/09, Scott Howell <s.how...@verizon.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenny, first only the Aluminum MacBooks contain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multi-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> touch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trackpad unless Apple upgrades the MacBook line-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aluminum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> models are now referred to as the MacBook Pro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine on your model. The most significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Intel processor since the Power PC chips, such
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> G4/G5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines will not be supported by SL. I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recommend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2Gb ram, but 1Gb will get the job done. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commands,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issued
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the trackpad are the same commands you can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VO. It is another means to interact with the os
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard to say what the future holds for such a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trackpad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point is that if you have heard the iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of how the trackpad could behave and a little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imagination
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to speculate what Apple could possibly do in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, have no fear and prepare to upgrade, it will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Jenny Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay. So am I to understand that the macbook
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that has this fancy mousepad thing? I got my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macbook
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> April
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of 08
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it is the little white one. I adore it and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SL to come out.  Will SL even work at all on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sort
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macbook?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure the os will work but will VO function
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fancy mousepad thing? Are there keyboard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortcuts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doable with the mousepad? Sorry to be so abrupt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gotta
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any answers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best wishes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenny
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/09, Claude Renaud <cldren...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello James,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunday, July 5, 2009, 12:31:19 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JN> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JN> I've been reading the new VO features in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leopard.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where di you read this please ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claude Renaud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>
>>
>> >
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to