sk wrote:
Hello,

I am a somewhat experienced Lyx user. Using Lyx 1.4.2. with the latest
MiKTeX (2.5 with updated packages from the 14.august.2006) on Windows
xp. I have reconfigured Lyx via the Menu (Tools -> reconfigure) after
all MiKTeX updates. I don't know much about plain LaTeX though (thats
why I use Lyx ;-))

Recently I have an annoying problem with a lyx document class
(g-brief-de). Whenever I try to export documents of this type to PDF via
pdflatex I get the following error:


LaTex Error: Command \Telefon already defined.

\newcommand\Telefon{\mvchr{84}}

Your command was ignored.
Type  I <command> <return>  to replace it with another command,
or  <return>  to continue without it.


At first I thought that there is something wrong with my document. So I
tried the g-brief-de.lyx template file from the Lyx templates folder. It
produces the same error!

I tried an uninstall of Lyx 1.4.2 and reinstalled 1.4.1 (with 1.4.1 it
used to work). But then it wouldn't even work in 1.4.1.! Now I have
1.4.2 up and running but the error persists!

Is this error reproducible by anyone? What causes the error? If it is
not reproducible, what am I doing wrong with my lyx installation?

Please help me. I have lots of old documents using this class. Also I
like the layout more than the g-brief2 class.

Thank you very much,

Stephan


I saw this problem mentioned not so long ago
and this is all I know about it.

--------------------------------------------

Telefon double definition in g-brief and mavrosym

Michael Hartje
Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:29:26 -0700

dear readers,

may be this is not lyx but TeX error. (I use the last Miktex WinXP)


mavrosym.sty (2006/05/11 v2.1) defines

\def\Telefon{{\mvchr84}}

while g-brief-de.layout (and the g-brief.cls in tex) defines

Style Telefon
...
        LatexName       Telefon
...
End


this stops latex every time using g-brief with errors when running automatic through mavrosym while using g-brief.

I would recommend for mavrosym.sty to change "Telefon" to "Telefone"!

best regards

Michael

-----------------------------------------------------------

Hope it helps,

Stephen

Reply via email to