Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | From what I've read, the merging algorithms of git are much more
| > | powerful than those of svn. But that is not really my point. Working
| > | with SVN means either that one guy controls everything (you)
| > Which is obviously not true. (Other than from an admin viewpoint)
|
| Maybe I am the only one thinking that way then. Or maybe you are the
| only one who thinks that's obviously not true?
I don't feel that I control what other people work on (If I do, please
tell, because that would be bad.)
I try to have some control on how things are done. (At least I want my
viewpoints (seems) to be taken into consideration.)
| > But there will be in systems that use (f.ex.) git, one master copy
| > somewhere.
|
| Sure but multiple versions will converge eventually at one point of
| time; and freedom to develop what you want would be encouraged. And
| who knows which copy will be the master at the end ;-)
True.
| > | or that
| > | each developer is trusted to do the right thing (comments are of
| > | course welcome and encouraged).
| > So the question is how to gain trust then...
| > (quite easy really...)
|
| No, the question is what "trust" means for you. I reckon that it means
| that one can gain trust from you if and only if he follow your way of
| working to the letter.
Sure that is the easy way... but not really required². And how many
here to you see following my way of working to the letter?
(Not even I do that.)
--
Lgb
