samar j. singh wrote: > Yes, I am sure it would. I have been trying to do this for about two weeks. > However, it appears there does not seem to be a single reliable > stimulus, which could point to multiple things happening or it could point > to a delay in the action of a given stimulus, or some combination of both.
Too bad. > On this same machine, I almost never had this with 1.3.6 which was my > previous version. I dont know if that helps. Not much. It indicates, however, that it might be a new bug (in 1.4) ;-) > Would it help if you had more of these reports? In that case, I would > continue to start lyx preceded with the core dump pre-requisite commands. It might help. I tried to read the backtrace but I couldn't make much sense out of it apart from what Martin already mentioned. Did you compile with --enable-stdlib-debug ? That might give some additional information (but will slow down LyX's performance significantly). Thanks for the report anyway, Jürgen
