On Monday 08 March 2004 10:23, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Remember that
> citing is the most important feature for human scientists. You wouldn't
> take the argument "you can both write formulas with and without AMS, so
> let's decide", would you?
:-) That is _exactly_ why I am writing my "Linux for Academia - for social
science and humanistics".
http://www.janus.dk/linux_in_academia/
I love LyX and the LyX documentation (it's even fun to read!). But I am afraid
that the average students from social science will find the parts about
formulas and technical xfigs a bit scare as an introduction. I am not writing
a new manual (the existing one is way to good for that), but introducing my
target group (coming from MS-Word and Endnote) to Lyx and showing them how
they can benefit from it. After my step-by-stip demonstration in making a
report thay can use the manual.
My point is that we have a large group of people here who can really benefit
from the Lyx/Jurabib combination - and I am so happy to read that something
good is waiting for us.
> Perhaps we can help propagating jurabib a bit with our support. Then it
> might well be that we can indeed ditch natbib some day.
I'll be happy to.
-j
--
Roskilde University, Denmark.
Department of Technology and Social Science.
International Development Studies.
ESST - Society, Science and Technology in Europe.
