Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > So we should support jurabib instead of natbib? > > And before you go into flusters:
;-) > I just think that we should actively support as few bib packages > as possible (preferrably only one). Agreed. > If jurabib can do the same as natbib and more: Great. Let's > use that and ditch natbib. OTOH if natbib does all the same as > jurabib does... why support jurabib? Jürgen is best placed to answer this. Jürgen? -- Angus
