On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:52:00AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | Several things that are not easily separated:
> >
> | This changes tactics: Instead of creating the 'global' cursor from the
> | inset locking information (which won't be available after IL is
> | removed) this tries to keep it up-to-date all the time.
> >
> | Failures are indicated by '### CURSOR OUT OF SYNC:' messages.  As this
> | happens often, dispatch() uses now the old route again, so the patch
> | should be safe.
> >
> | There is now a  'LCursor BufferView_pimpl::cursor' member (the
> | 'per-bufferview global cursor')
> >
> | I also moved part of the LFUN_INSET_EDIT stuff out of Inset::dispatch
> | again into edit() functions. Reason is mainly separating two separate
> | ideas: 1. edit means 'open some dialog' (this is still in dispatch())
> | and 2. edt means 'enter some text inset and lock it' (this is back in
> | edit())
> 
> I am not sure about the handling of FINISHED_XXX in LCursor::dispatch.

This is not active yet.

> Can some of the dispatch changes wait?

What part?  Why?

Andre'

Reply via email to