On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:09:50AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:58:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> | Failures are indicated by '### CURSOR OUT OF SYNC:' messages. As this
> >> | happens often, dispatch() uses now the old route again, so the patch
> >> | should be safe.
> >>
> >> And you are replacing part of my new dispatch code with your old not
> >> updated one.
> >
> | Where?
>
> LCursor::dispatch
This is my playground. It's not even active right now.
> LyXFunc::dispatch
That's just
@@ -882,16 +882,15 @@ void LyXFunc::dispatch(FuncRequest const
view()->hideCursor();
#if 1
- {
- Cursor cursor;
- buildCursor(cursor, *view());
- DispatchResult result =
- cursor.dispatch(FuncRequest(func, view()));
-
- if (result.dispatched()) {
- if (result.update()) {
- view()->update();
- }
+ if (view()->theLockingInset() != view()->cursor().innerInset()) {
+ lyxerr << "### CURSOR OUT OF SYNC: tli: " <<
view()->theLockingInset()
+ << "\ncursor:\n" << view()->cursor() << endl;
+
+ }
+
+ // not active yet...
+ if (0) {
+ if (view()->cursor().dispatch(FuncRequest(func,
view())).dispatched()) {
lyxerr << "dispatched by Cursor::dispatch()\n";
goto exit_with_message;
}
i.e. six or seven lines combined to a single one and wrapped in 'if (0)'.
> I'd really like to see Cursor changes and Dispatch changes in
> different patches...
Waste of time IMO.
*shrug*
Andre'
