On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:10:32PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:42:04PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/branch7.jpeg > > Thanks. I don't like the Note dialog (apart from the branch list issue > mentioned already). The "Type" thing seems unclear and non-obvious. > > I haven't thought through a nicer UI yet. It may just be a terminology > issue.
I have (or Michael, rather): a single choice box containing what are
now "type" entries, plus all the branch names available in this
document (an editable list saved in doc header).
> From what I can see though, this seems to be a pretty nice solution
> until we have a proper outliner. I haven't looked at the patch.
>
> >+ _("blind|comment|foot|margin|petite|greyedout|branch");
>
> Can you please (re- ?) explain greyedout, petite, comment, and blind ?
blind: old-fashioned note, not output, just for the author.
greyedout: output as grey text
petite: small(er) print ("intermezzo" would be better name, functional
not visual)
comment: outputs verbatim's "comment" environment. Functionally same
as "blind", but done through LaTeX.
This list subject to change (anybody needs "endnote"?)
> What happens if I have a clashing branch name ?
?
currently impossible. branch name and inset type are different
variables. Under the new system we will have to handle that (disallow)
somehow.
> regards
> john
>
- Martin
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
