Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Only a DESM is certainly a step forward but doesn't solve Alfredo's > | original complaint: non-const cursor movement. [...]
> I have already said that the const patch should go in. I think that you didn't up to now. I will rediff the patch. And as you now this patch removes only the false 'cheat solution', not the problem (i.e. that cursor movement doesn't leave the document const). Alfredo
