John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:28:47PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> > I also don't think we've had anybody really arguing against the >> > disablement of DEPM (Paragraphs) itself though, have we ? Or are you >> > against it ? >> >> Are you joking? I'm positively in favour of disabling DEPM. > > I meant this particular variant.
I certainly like it better than DEPM (par). I forgot already what I was
complaining about ;)
No testing yet, I'll let you know.
Regards,
Alfredo
