On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:01:19AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | Like this : > | > | blah |a blah > | > | after a "delete" key : > | > | blah |blah > > So we are then back to the situation we had several years ago and that > nobody liked. (not allowing the cursor to be placed between to > spaces.)
Hmm. Yes I can see that being annoying. Bleh, I'm not sure what to do about this space thing at all now. Perhaps: limit to two spaces maximum, and strip the extra one on output ? > I am not so sure that I agree with this "remove DEPM" mantra. Let's not confuse the paragraph handling with the space thing. We might have to go for a space solution but I believe my DEPM patch for paragraphs is OK. > | alternatively we could just strip spaces on save/export too. But it's a > | lot easier to accidentally create two-spaces rather than two-paragraphs, > | so I'm not sure that's a good idea. > > You are sure that this will not just result in a DEPM spread all over > instead of in a single function? Well, let's be real here, the effects of DEPM have rippled through a significant part of the tree; you have to admit it's not "just one function". Whereas a small tweak in the output routines is a million times more localised. regards, john
