Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 22 August 2002 12:11 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 12:10:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > Martin> Actually I don't like this either. Too much extra handling all
>> > Martin> over the place. So I say: restrict the LFUN to insert only in
>> > Martin> position 0 of the paragraph, in a 'legal' paragraph for
>> > Martin> inserting an optional arg. That could be done in
>> > Martin> BufferView_pimpl.C, or more cleanly using the getStatus
>> > Martin> mechanism (Jean-Marc?)
>> >
>> > I still do not see what restricting where the inset goes buys us.
>>
>> Actually you're right. Wherever you put it, it's clear what paragraph --
>> and what section or caption number -- it is associated with. Just as a
>> LaTeX label embedded in it. Location within the paragraph means nothing.
>>
>> Still, making the inset button carry the counter, as I originally
>> envigaged, would be cool...
>
| Wouldn't this happen automatically if/when you create an InsetCaption. I
| picture this InsetCaption as having
| * an InsetText for the main body of the Caption
| * a Counter * that points to a Counter in a Section, but not in a starred
| Section.
| * an InsetOptArg *. Ditto.
>
| That way you can control exactly how the Inset draws itself in one place,
| InsetCaption::draw.
| if (counter_)
| draw_counter();
| if (optarg_)
| draw_optarg();
| inset_.draw();
>
| Moreover, a paragraph would contain just one InsetCaption and nothing else.
| If you later change the Layout back to standard, you can again define a
| conversion method in InsetCaption.
|
| Seems clean encapsulation to me.
Misuse of InsetCaption if you ask me...
--
Lgb
