>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:57:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: >> I'm saying there isn't far to go to get this to a much better state >> than it is now. Most of the work has been done already -- in this >> patch in fact -- just the last 10% to get rid of "free floating" >> optional arguement insets (and preferably section insets similar to >> many of the previous discussions). >> >> I just don't want the current patch in 1.3.0 -- the work should be >> finished before then otherwise there'll be some yucky conversions >> to handle. Martin> Sorry, I give up. If it's only as little as 10%, and you Martin> actually know how to, why don't *you* do it? Don't pay too much attention to what Allan says. Nobody does :) I for one think that this patch is what we need now, even if it has to be superceded by something better in a later lyx version. And contrary to what allan would have us believe, there are cases where this optional argument cannot be linked to any special bibtiem-like inset. Personally, I am planning to apply the patch, unless Lars objects (in which case I will have no other choice than to say that I knew from the beginning that the patch was wrong :). JMarc
