Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| I'm sorry if the impression I gained from your emails didn't match
| your intentions.  However, if my memory and impressions haven't
| completely failed me I can say that I'm in agreement with JMarc and
| John's arguements over the last week in particular.

I realize that something has to be done fast, but I have just not had
the spare time to do it.

| My greatest concern isn't so much that your greater skills are leading
| development away from what the rest of us can handle (or our
| compilers) but that major development is still occurring in the trunk
| when it had been planned for almost two years now that after 1.2.0 the
| trunk should be kept stable (apart from the temporary instability
| caused by merging branches) and non-trivial development would/should
| occur in branches.

The issue is not stability, it is size of binaries, compile times etc.
And the change to boost::signals and boost::regex was really
trivial...

| I'm also concerned that the recent burst of changes in the GUII
| framework in the trunk would have been better timed after John's
| branch was incorporated.

Please note that almost none of the changes I have tried out has
actually been committed. The only change to the GUII framework has
been re removal of the "GUIAboutlyx" classes in GUI.h. And that change
should be transparent.

-- 
        Lgb


Reply via email to