On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 06:21:13PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Mi., 28. Apr. 2021 um 18:19 Uhr schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org > >: > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 06:57:19PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:44:58AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Good to know. I'm curious, what is your use case for wanting to use it > > with > > > > some documents and not others? In order to (potentially) design an > > interface, > > > > I want to understand how people use it. > > > > > > I use it only with few documents -- 3rd party texts which need quick > > > proofreading for typos but are too long for paper print (or not worth > > > of paper altogether). > > > > I see. I'm not sure how to proceed on this. I propose a hypothetical that > > might help: > > > > Suppose that I ask on lyx-users and the results show that most people on > > lyx-users who use synctex prefer to have a way to enable it globally (i.e., > > in preferences). Would we then consider to add a preference if a proposal > > for an interface is intuitive? If not, then it seems there's point in > > asking on lyx-users in the first place. > > > > I don't have a strong opinion on this. Enrico's approach of manually > > adding it to the converter commands is not a difficult workaround for users > > to implement. I feel we can make a smoother experience for users, but if > > others disagree I'm fine to drop this. > > > > FWIW I also use it only for individual documents (also because it is a bit > slower and makes slightly larger documents.
Ah that makes sense. I think your and Pavel's feedback is enough to suggest that it doesn't make sense to look into changing things. Thanks! Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
