On 2018-11-13 17:10, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 13. November 2018 16:46:47 CET schrieb Daniel <xraco...@gmx.de>:
On 13/11/2018 15:13, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 13. November 2018 15:02:53 CET schrieb Daniel <xraco...@gmx.de>:
On 13/11/2018 13:38, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 13. November 2018 12:56:02 CET schrieb Daniel <xraco...@gmx.de>:
On 13/11/2018 12:10, Kornel Benko wrote:
If using features italic and emphasized together, then the display on lyx
screen looks upright.
We can see it in UserGuide.lyx at C.1.1.1
stdmenus.inc specifies the menu entries for the standard menus
The latex code is
\item [{stdmenus.inc}] \textit{\emph{specifies the menu entries for the
standard menus}}
But what is more irritating is the pdf output, which shows the same behavior.
So \textit and \emph seem to neutralize each other?
Kornel
Doesn't \emph by default use italics? And then it makes sense to me that
it cancels out. Consider a longer passage that is set in italics. It
makes sense to have emphasises to work that way you describe to make it
stand out.
Hm, yes, that makes sense. Still, some visual difference in lyx screen would
make sense for me too.
Do you have any suggestions how to visualize the difference in a
sensible way? I couldn't think of any.
Different color
or better: dotted underline (with dots in specific (yellow) color)
I am a fan of dotted underline for misspelled words as you might
remember. But I am not sure I would like emphasis to be colored that
way. It is normally not a mistake but intentional in theorems and such.
But maybe the search for character styles could highlight all instances
in the document?
That is not possible ...
Is this still due to otherwise bad performance?
Daniel
