Am Freitag, 16. November 2018 15:48:01 CET schrieb Daniel <xraco...@gmx.de>: > On 16/11/2018 15:30, Daniel wrote: > > On 16/11/2018 13:02, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Freitag, 16. November 2018 12:28:08 CET schrieb Daniel > >> <xraco...@gmx.de>: > >>>>> I am a fan of dotted underline for misspelled words as you might > >>>>> remember. But I am not sure I would like emphasis to be colored that > >>>>> way. It is normally not a mistake but intentional in theorems and > >>>>> such. > >>>>> But maybe the search for character styles could highlight all > >>>>> instances > >>>>> in the document? > >>>> > >>>> That is not possible ... > >>> > >>> Is this still due to otherwise bad performance? > >> > >> No, it is because we highlight only ONE found string. > > > > So, does highlighting of all found strings seem like a reasonable > > enhancement? > > Maybe I should have read your reply more charitable. I guess you meant > that highlighting only "ONE" found string is the only reasonable way. > So, let me explain a bit. > > One could introduce a (different) secondary highlight color which > highlights all found instances in the document while the search > window/widget is open and the search string non-empty. Several > applications already support this including many browsers, pdf reader, > and word processors (not Libre Office though, I think, but MS Word). > > Daniel >
I have no idea how to add it to existing search machinery.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
