On 27 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:

> Hmm, that might have been one of the mails denied for "not
> authenticated" reasons. but I know that I _wrote_ the mail.

Ah, OK, sorry.

> This is then closer to what I wanted in the beginning then (~5 years
> ago)

Well you'll find my patches often solve 5 year old feature requests </joke>

>         - if already open      -> switch to that buffer

except for that perhaps.

I would really like a big re-jig of the available lyxfuncs, but it would go
hand in hand with the re-working I'm always carping on about. It would of
course involve a million emails from me to lyx-devel going "Why ?" or "Why not ?"

thanks
john

-- 
"Creating laws which cannot be universally enforced leads to arbitrary enforcement."
        - Upsilon, /.

Reply via email to