On 27 Feb 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | thanks
> | john
>
> I never got a reason on the "buffer-open" -> "file-open" change.
How do you expect me to answer questions you haven't asked ?
you REALLY should have mentioned this before I diffed 4 times
> IMO this is a separate issue from the guii of filedlg, and should be
> in a separate patch... if done at all.
Because of the semantic change in LyXFunc::Open() i.e. it handles
both the no-file and specified-file cases now. It is used by both
the lyx code and the user via the minibuffer, and via the menus. the
LFUN_MENUOPEN case is a special case of the generic open code
Look at the LFUN_MENUWRITEAS -> LFUN_WRITEAS change; it's basically the
same except that the equivalent of "LFUN_OPEN" already existed i.e. LFUN_FILE_OPEN
If you really want I can keep a compatible "buffer-open" but can I please
do this in a patch on top ?
john
--
"Creating laws which cannot be universally enforced leads to arbitrary enforcement."
- Upsilon, /.
