Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 15:47:28, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > On 2016-11-07, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 15:10:09, schrieb Kornel Benko > > <kor...@lyx.org> > >> Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 13:44:17, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> <mi...@users.sf.net> > > Dear Kornel, > > ... > > >> > I'd like an "expansion" of > >> > export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols.lyx into > >> > > >> > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2 > >> > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_utf8 > >> > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_armscii > >> > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_latin1 > >> > ... > >> > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_tis620-0 > >> > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_utf8-plain > >> > export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_ascii > >> > > >> > Would this be feasible? > > >> Yes, it is. New parameter for useSystemFonts.pl. But I'd prefer to use > >> it only for files in a special directory. > > So do I: please limit the "expansion" with *all* encodings to the > directory "autotests/export/latex/Unicode-characters" (maybe renaming it > to "autotests/export/latex/test_lib_unicodesymbols/" first). With the > "inputenc expansion", I would remove the "*utf8.lyx" samples, of course. > > (OTOH, I still suggest testing "utf8" and "ascii" input encodings with all > samples and pdf2.) > > >> Do you want to test also combinations like 084-misc-symbols_pdf4_utf8 ? > > Ouch .. I see you already want it ... > >> Looks like overkill ... > > One export route suffices. This is why I set the "default output format" > to pdf2 in the sample files.
Do you(we) want all encoding tests for 084-misc-symbols_pdf2* be contained in
one test, or
do you prefer them be separate?
> Thanks,
>
> Günter
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
