Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 13:44:17, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > Dear Kornel, > > On 2016-11-07, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 7. November 2016 um 07:29:39, schrieb Guenter Milde > > <mi...@users.sf.net> > > >> the recent discussion about http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10474 > >> showed, that input encoding support was never fully tested. > > >> I suggest to extend the tests in autotests/export/latex/Unicode-characters > >> to all encodings defined in lib/encodings. > > >> Could you write a rule testing > >> "autotests/export/latex/Unicode-characters/*.lyx" with all encodings > > > I don't understand. This directory already exists ... > > Yes, but currently, it only tests 2 out of 51 LyX-supported input encodings. > And, it does so with 2*9 separate files for 9 Unicode blocks in 2 fixed > encodings (ascii and utf8). > > Instead of adding 9*49 new files (and changing 51 files with every > correction/addition), I'd prefer a ctest rule that allows to test all 51 > LyX-supported input encodings based on 9 sample files. > > The test machinery does a similar action with the test of various export > routes for one sample file. > > Just like doc/de/Intro.lyx is tested as > > Test #923: export/doc/de/Intro_xhtml > Test #924: export/doc/de/Intro_dvi > Test #925: export/doc/de/Intro_dvi3_texF > Test #926: export/doc/de/Intro_dvi3_systemF > Test #927: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf > Test #928: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf2 > Test #929: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf3 > Test #930: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf4_texF > Test #931: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf4_systemF > Test #932: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf5_texF > Test #933: export/doc/de/Intro_pdf5_systemF
Yes, but this is derived from possible lyx export types.
> I'd like an "expansion" of
> export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols.lyx into
>
> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2
> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_utf8
> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_armscii
> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_latin1
> ...
> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_tis620-0
> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_utf8-plain
> export/export/latex/Unicode-characters/084-misc-symbols_pdf2_ascii
>
> Would this be feasible?
Yes, it is. New parameter for useSystemFonts.pl. But I'd prefer to use it only
for
files in a special directory.
Do you want to test also combinations like 084-misc-symbols_pdf4_utf8 ?
Looks like overkill ...
> Thanks,
>
> Günter
>
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
