On 2016-01-14, Guenter Milde wrote: Dear Scott and Kornel,
what do you think about this proposed change: > The system font replacement is no longer necessary: > * It was a workaround to get working examples with 2.1. > * It has the drawback that it may become very complicated to understand > and reproduce what is going on in case there is a failure. > * With 2.2 you can store alternative system fonts in the source, so the > workaround is no longer required. > In the single case of "wrong" replacements (Hebrew: sans serif font for > serif and monospaced, because there is no working serif and monospaced > font), I propose to mark the example and manual docs as "inverted" > and add a special purpose document with working fonts. Günter
