Am Montag, 4. Januar 2016 um 17:51:29, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > On 2016-01-04, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > > > Am Montag, 4. Januar 2016 um 08:57:04, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > <skost...@lyx.org> > >> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:36:09PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> > On 2016-01-03, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> > > If you are OK with these other test failures and you think it is the > >> > > right > >> > > thing to do, then correct the test labels such that there shouldn't be > >> > > any > >> > > differences to test failures after your patch is applied. Post a new > >> > > patch and > >> > > I will confirm that nothing changes. > >> > > >> > Actually, you list is good news: > >> > > >> > There are even more cases of test thats "fails to fail" than I expected. > > >> Good. > > >> > In all cases of new inversions, this is just extending an existing > >> > inversion > >> > for "pdf[45]_systemF" to ".*_systemF" - this is a hint to a problem with > >> > polyglossia > >> > (either the language nesting bug or some known incompatibility with some > >> > other package). > > >> OK good to know. > > >> > I hope the attached patch addresses all changing test cases. > > >> I do not see an attached patch. Did it not attach correctly? > > > He probably means his previously sent inline patch. > > No, the updated patch I forgot to "inline-attach". > > > Günter, could you resend the patch (this time attached and not inline)? > > I'll to so but I don't know whether this works with the GMANE-news interface.
Apparently it does not work.
> (OTOH, inlined patches can easily be applied by saving the complete mail and
> doing `git am -3 <patch.mbox>`.)
I am not convinced that the mail-text is not corrupted in some way
(e.g. long lines split ...).
Is the patch made with 'git am ' committed, or only applied?
How to revert?
'git help am' does not really help much.
> Günter
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
