On 2016-01-04, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Montag, 4. Januar 2016 um 08:57:04, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <skost...@lyx.org> >> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:36:09PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: >> > On 2016-01-03, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > > If you are OK with these other test failures and you think it is the >> > > right >> > > thing to do, then correct the test labels such that there shouldn't be >> > > any >> > > differences to test failures after your patch is applied. Post a new >> > > patch and >> > > I will confirm that nothing changes. >> > >> > Actually, you list is good news: >> > >> > There are even more cases of test thats "fails to fail" than I expected. >> Good. >> > In all cases of new inversions, this is just extending an existing >> > inversion >> > for "pdf[45]_systemF" to ".*_systemF" - this is a hint to a problem with >> > polyglossia >> > (either the language nesting bug or some known incompatibility with some >> > other package). >> OK good to know. >> > I hope the attached patch addresses all changing test cases. >> I do not see an attached patch. Did it not attach correctly? > He probably means his previously sent inline patch. No, the updated patch I forgot to "inline-attach". > Günter, could you resend the patch (this time attached and not inline)? I'll to so but I don't know whether this works with the GMANE-news interface. (OTOH, inlined patches can easily be applied by saving the complete mail and doing `git am -3 <patch.mbox>`.) Günter
