Am 05.05.2011 um 10:22 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de> wrote: >> "elyx" might be confusing (as it does not have any relation to the "elyxer" >> LyX->HTML converter). >> > We could consider 'blyx' (from Bundle LyX) or 'glyx' (from GIT LyX). > Naming aside, it would be very impressive (!) if a bundle format can > be implemented using GIT, and in a transparent way for the end user. > (Of course, under the condition that I actually understand what is > being proposed :) .)
Aren't the 'Bundle LyX' and 'GIT LyX' "feature" somehow orthogonal? Stephan
