Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 05.05.2011 um 10:22 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de> > > wrote: > >> "elyx" might be confusing (as it does not have any relation to the "elyxer" > >> LyX->HTML converter). > >> > > We could consider 'blyx' (from Bundle LyX) or 'glyx' (from GIT LyX). > > Naming aside, it would be very impressive (!) if a bundle format can > > be implemented using GIT, and in a transparent way for the end user. > > (Of course, under the condition that I actually understand what is > > being proposed :) .) > > > Aren't the 'Bundle LyX' and 'GIT LyX' "feature" somehow orthogonal?
no, the idea was to connect bundling with git management. imagine history of revisions, now even with figures, within the file itself. pavel
