Am 04.11.2010 um 16:15 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >>>> I'll use an explicit getRevisionInfo() success state flag and return >>>> string() instead. Ok? >>> >>> not sure what exactly do you mean :) >> >> That's how I understood your comment, but the new patch is not ready... >> >> Like that: >> > > i'm basically happy that the duplicated strings disappeared. > lyxerr looks more approriate inside getRevisionInfo.
Ok. > iirc svn used "?" hack for this, but do as you wish.. Yes, this I didn't like. Stephan
