Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I don't see why HTML converters are to be treated differently. For me, > bibliography converters are _much_ more important than HTML converters. OTOH > I > have a whole lot of HTML converters installed simply because I have a TeXLive > full install. I do not use a single of them. > > You see how subjective this question is?
i have never claimed my opinion to be objective. its more matter how many people will vote on which side. pavel
