Alex Fernandez wrote: > From my point of view there is the related issue that I don't like the > way conversion is done from within LyX in 1.6.x or in 2.x: while with > PDF LyX states clearly that it is using pdflatex or ps2pdf, with HTML > it doesn't say if it's eLyXer, htlatex or what. Also, once it finds > one HTML tool it doesn't recognize other tools, so users can't compare > the output or choose the best tool for the job. There is a tendency to > bury eLyXer and similar tools in the "HTML" menu entry without > recognizing their existence, maybe because HTML is despised as a > format. Then there is the possible confusion between the old "HTML" > format and the new "LyX HTML" format. I don't want people to start > complaining about eLyXer only to find out that it is not my code; but > I do want people to know they are using eLyXer and complain about it > when they are. Finally, there is no willingness to acknowledge these > as problems or fix them eventually; so even with commit rights it's > doubtful I could solve them.
for this particular issue, do you have a patch? pavel
