Andre Poenitz wrote: > > i haven't look on the QProcess yet, but if it works like execvp > > it will completely break eg version control handling. > > What is the special need of version control handling?
two issues - 1. from time to time we use more shell commands in one string. this wont work if qprocess works like execvp (there is also no clear distinction what is called program and its argument - so this should be fixed too.) 2. i remember the error handling was strange from ::system and i dont expect it will be the same for qprocess, so this should be fixed too. pavel
