On 09/05/2009 22:23, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 09:21:33PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
if you implement only additional parameters for programs detected by
configure and then run some kind of execvp call rather than the normal
system call, no additional program can be run that way.
Since execvp is platform-dependant (only UNIX), QProcess strikes me like the
way to go.
Is there any argument to not shove Peter's patch in(to trunk)?
i haven't look on the QProcess yet, but if it works like execvp
it will completely break eg version control handling.
What is the special need of version control handling?
Nothing I guess. A process is a process is a process. And QProcess
offers a good number of ways to deal with a process.
Abdel.
