Am Samstag 09 Mai 2009 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > if you implement only additional parameters for programs detected by > > > configure and then run some kind of execvp call rather than the normal > > > system call, no additional program can be run that way. > > > > Since execvp is platform-dependant (only UNIX), QProcess strikes me like > > the way to go. > > > > Is there any argument to not shove Peter's patch in(to trunk)? > > i haven't look on the QProcess yet, but if it works like execvp > it will completely break eg version control handling.
I think, hanging on for some reason blocked version control should not prevent
us to do other things with lyx. So I would prefer QProcess here too.
> we have some discussions about this some time ago with Peter and
> haven't come to any solution. i wanted that the qprocess-ing would
> be involved only in latex compilation, which was the purpose after
> all, while he wanted to make it general and switch to qprocess
> everywhere.
>
> pavel
I like the method how e.g. firefox loads new pages. It allows me to do other
things in parallel. So, I too would make it as general as possible.
And it is trunk, so we could gain some experience. Reverting it should be not
too hard.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
