Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > if you implement only additional parameters for programs detected by > > configure and then run some kind of execvp call rather than the normal > > system call, no additional program can be run that way. > > Since execvp is platform-dependant (only UNIX), QProcess strikes me like the > way to go. > > Is there any argument to not shove Peter's patch in(to trunk)?
i haven't look on the QProcess yet, but if it works like execvp it will completely break eg version control handling. we have some discussions about this some time ago with Peter and haven't come to any solution. i wanted that the qprocess-ing would be involved only in latex compilation, which was the purpose after all, while he wanted to make it general and switch to qprocess everywhere. pavel
