Juergen jestured,
> On 23-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'd lean towards either the M-a for math or eliminating the math menu
> > altogether. Probably the latter, as it strikes me that the whole
> > floating set of tools will be necessary when folks start working with
> > math. It will also cause less problems with obstruction of the text .
> Maybe I'm a bit tough in understanding all of this, but would it be really
> much more ease to just change the MENU binding for &Math to M&ath and so
> have M-a for the mathmenu leaving M-m for the math binding?!
THat sounds like the easiest to me--byut then again, anything that lets
me keep using the bindings my fingers know will keep me happy . . . But
I do doubt that anyone regularly uses the math menu for anything other
than getting a math panel . . .
hawk
--
