On 23-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I'd lean towards either the M-a for math or eliminating the math menu 
> altogether.  Probably the latter, as it strikes me that the whole 
> floating set of tools will be necessary when folks start working with 
> math.  It will also cause less problems with obstruction of the text . 

Maybe I'm a bit tough in understanding all of this, but would it be really
much more ease to just change the MENU binding for &Math to M&ath and so
have M-a for the mathmenu leaving M-m for the math binding?!

      Jürgen

--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._

Dr. Jürgen Vigna        E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N       Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen           Web:     http://www.sad.it/~jug

-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._

There is nothing wrong with Southern California that a rise in the
ocean level wouldn't cure.
                -- Ross MacDonald

Reply via email to