On 23-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'd lean towards either the M-a for math or eliminating the math menu
> altogether. Probably the latter, as it strikes me that the whole
> floating set of tools will be necessary when folks start working with
> math. It will also cause less problems with obstruction of the text .
Maybe I'm a bit tough in understanding all of this, but would it be really
much more ease to just change the MENU binding for &Math to M&ath and so
have M-a for the mathmenu leaving M-m for the math binding?!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
There is nothing wrong with Southern California that a rise in the
ocean level wouldn't cure.
-- Ross MacDonald