[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> lars lamented,
>
> > Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > | Yes, LyX had the hability to give users the choice to use the interface
> > | they liked the more. Is really necessary to take away that?
>
> > We won't take away _anything_ from the user. The question is how LyX
> > should be configured by default.
>
> In this particualr case, though, I think we need to do something
> quickly. Without the bindings, LyX is currently unusable for us
> keystroke junkies whow write math . . . I'm forced to use the older
> version fromm debian, wiht the incompatible tables . . .
>
> I'd label restoration of keybindings as a "must" before release.
>
> --
Did you see my proposal to use M-capital-letters for menu shortcuts,
which would leave M-m available for math key bindings.
Would you find that acceptable?
Marko observed:
And LyX will be the only program I know to do that :). Actually, I know
a
lot of people who open menu and select menu item by keyboard only using
M-f o, for example.
-----------------------------
But LyX does not have rulers, tabs, doublespaces after periods either.
And how many other programs have hollywood and broadway :)
Garst
