Pavel Sanda wrote:
that will be my last commit.
that is the best solution if you cannot live with compromise.
i guess he could live if people start to flame embedding philosophy when he
asked in start of implementing. i fully understand the frustration of reverting
it back after months of development when nobody raised a single voice. so its
not only Bo's strong opinion but inattention of the rest of us in the
beginning.
Very true.
interesting question is if we can minimize or prevent such troubles in the
future, because its pity to lose devs in this way. one idea coming to my mind
is to change the way how main features are proposed or planned in the beginning
of the release cycle. maybe to get one oponent or revision of general
construction (details can be flamed always, but not the general things.) thats
just idea, maybe its just too much burden, don't know.
Actually, I remember some discussion before and during the
implementation (at least with Jose IIRC). So the procedure was OK in
this case. It is just that this feature is particularly difficult to grasp.
Abdel.
