Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I uploaded a new snapshot of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows. >> The first alpha of LyX 1.6 was build a week ago, this version includes >> additionally the bugfixes from this week (erything until SVN commit 24066). > > shouldn't be such kind of release signed as lyx 1.6.0svn? > once users start to make bug reports it will be chaotic to which version > they refer when alpha1 will point to different revisions. > > secondly, alpha1 was not officially released yet and such kind of announcement > shouldn't come before the official one, imho.
Yes, it would have been better to release it as 1.6svn-r24066, or just wait for the others. I am not sure why you _need_ to do that, especially without asking around first. JMarc
