Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>
>> But LyX is about outputting stuff with proper semantics, not
>> \fbox{\parbox{\columnwidth-2\fboxsep-2\fboxrule}{
>
> What do you mean, this is proper semantics.
It does not say what the intention is. I would be surprised if tex2lyx
is able to transform that properly, for example.
> When you have a cleaner code to get the same output, I'll implement
> this.
I know this does not exist yet. Does not make our design look better.
> As said, this code is only used when the user wants tha have the full
> column or line width. So yes we are sure that nobody wants to have
> boxes sticking into the page margin. When there is no frame around the
> box, nothing is subtracted. So in any case you get exactly what you
> want so the width will be the same and thus the alignment too.
I think this is trying to be too clever on the user's back. I'd be
more comfortable with a checkbox allowing to choose whether we set the
outer width or inner width.
> When I've not overseen something, only section 6.8 has explicit ERT.
> I'll move this to the math manual I'm writing.
Find tells me:
3.5.1.1
3.5.1.2
3.5.4
3.5.5
3.6.2 (a weird one)
3.8.2
JMarc
