Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So your proposal is absolutely correct, but I want to put it in trunk >> anyway. When this should really make problems, what I don't assume as >> _exactly_ setting the width can only be done currently via ERT, somebody >> will shout in the months between the first official LyX 1.6 snapshot and >> the final release. >> That this is a WONTFIX for branch is clear. > > Let's see what others say.
I think that first improving LyX length reading and then fixing the bug is the way to go. But, more than that, this shows that we should be very careful before introducing features in LyX where the output is hardcoded to some peculiar preference of the patch author. We should definitely not need out output hardcoded lengths to latex like we do. Also, I think that advocating using ERT very freely in many parts of the manuals is something we are eventually going to regret. JMarc
