Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 2. Februar 2007 11:14 schrieb Helge Hafting:
>> Bo Peng wrote:
>>>> A weird effect, but easy to fix by moving that math bar to the side.
>>> I can not reproduce this with qt4.2.2. If you are using windows, maybe
>>> you can download today's snapshot from http://www.lyx.org/~bpeng and
>>> see if you can reproduce it?
>> I don't use windows, so I can't.  This is not really a problem, just a 
> small
>> oddity. With qt42.2.2 fixing it I see no reason to spend more time
>> on it - qt4.2.2 will come to debian too.
> 
> But not very soon. Etch (the next stable release) is frozen and will be 
> released with 4.2.1. Therefore many people (including me) will use 4.2.1 
> for a long time.
> It really frustrates me that there is so little will to support anything 
> but the latest and greatest programs and libraries.
> 
> 
> Georg
> 

Sorry, I couldn't resist:
I'm looking forward to use Qt 4.3 features. ;)


Seriously:

Do you think you-as a main developer of lyx- will
have problems to build Qt 4.x by your own?
(I assume it's a question of your principles
because even I have mangaged to compile Qt4.2
on linux, wasn't it ./configure & make? :) )

Or do you only think about the packageing?
Then, yes, this could really become a problem.

Would it be possible to link Qt statically to lyx for
all people not having the Qt>4.2.1? Or is there to
much distro dependend stuff in a static linked lyx?

(I assume you don't wanna link statically because
of the wasted memory.)

Peter

Reply via email to