Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 22:12 schrieb Bo Peng: > This is also true for LFUN, since LFUN_PASTE should be the same as > LFUN_CLIBPARD_PASTE. (We have at most two sorts of paste, why three > LFUNs?)
Of course we could do everything with one lfun, but that would mean even more argument processing in dispatch() and getStatus(). Therefore I think we should keep the separate lfuns. Georg
