Martin Vermeer wrote: > Remind me what is the rationale for this? iso8859-1 works well for me.
iso8859-1 has the EURO sign (while iso8859-1 doesn't; it has a general and less useful "currency" symbol at that code point). Jürgen
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Remind me what is the rationale for this? iso8859-1 works well for me.
iso8859-1 has the EURO sign (while iso8859-1 doesn't; it has a general and less useful "currency" symbol at that code point). Jürgen