On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:18:40PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:10:08PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: > > > Decide on your own what that means for Qt3... > > One small note: if qt3 dies (and the development cost does seem quite > onerous), then the first 1.5.0 release should have clear pointers and > instructions on how to get qt4 for common platforms. Aside from > non-bleeding-edge Linux distributions, there's also the BSDs and Solaris > to consider.
Qt 4 compiles cleanly with a non-outdated compiler (e.g. gcc < 3.0 or such). Andre'
