Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > #ifdef NEW_CODE
| > #endif
| > or:
| > create new files for the newstuff and conditional compile so that you
| > can get the new stuff and all others get the ols stuff.
|
| I don't think that's a good way to do any development sorry.
I have done it with success several times.
Ah... now I understand why there's a ton of "#if 0" in the code!
I cannot fathom why you cannot do it as well.
Because that's a waste of time and I don't like #ifdef. The current code
is shXXXt (sorry John and Angus ;-)), I cannot fathom why you want to
keep that. If I cannot produce anything better than this there's always
the possibility to revert to this older version. I really cannot fathom
why you are so keen on keeping nice SCM history without actually using it.
See? There can always be counter arguments to your way of thinking...
We're just continuing a nonsense dialog so let's just drop it. I've
definitively lost any motivation to do this work anyway.
Abdel.
