On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:38 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > > | You've just described my very plan ;-). I just thought it was obvious > > | so I didn't care to write it so explicitly. The problem is just that > > | Lars won't allow step 1. > > > > Very right. If the bus thing happens after step 1, we are left with no > > spellchecker. > > Man, we are not talking about the linux kernel. This is not rocket > science we are doing here. If I am hit by a bus, another competent > developer will be able to continue the work. We have quite a few here...
But why even take the risk? Why not add enchant support first -- and do all the controller sanitizing this may require -- and only THEN start removing things? Methinks Lars' concern is valid. It's not a 'no', it's a 'please do this a little bit differently'. I've been asked the same, been irritated by it, but Lars has been in this game a lot longer than you and me. - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
