On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:

>  Although I agree with you in several points I should say that, here,
> almost all the cases where the definition is empty are used as
> placeholders for future improvement.

I don't like it but it's not your fault. Finally we are discussing a new
inset model.
 
>  InsetLatex is the only exception as I think it is completly obsolete.

I agree. Why it has not been removed?

>  As a side question: what about insets completly externally
> configured?

This is like M$ Word uses components. The disadvantage is that we have
less control over them, but it would be useful to discuss this approach
too.

Greets, 

Alejandro

Reply via email to